Electrical R&D · Battery systems · BESS assurance

Engineering decisions backed by inspectable evidence.

Battery models, grid controls and BESS assurance, with methods and evidence you can inspect.

Conceptual electro-thermal model and battery assembly.

01—04 Physics → models → evidence → energy systems Illustrative · no live data

Full film

Explore the system map and engineering background

Mohammad Rezwan Khan · Electrical R&D Engineer · PhD in Energy Technology, Aalborg University. His work connects battery thermal systems, BESS QA/QC, FAT/SAT readiness, grid-forming control, and MATLAB/Simulink model validation.

Energy systems, storage and controlConceptual system
Battery, conversion, grid, solar and mobility topology Conceptual connections, not live telemetry or executed tests.
  • Control
  • Solar
  • Battery
  • Grid
  • Mobility

Arrow keys pan; +/− zoom; Home resets. Enter or Space selects. Illustrative flow, not a scientific test.

System mapPhysical system → model → verification → decision

Follow the work.
Inspect the evidence.

Models and upstream work, linked to source.

Energy domains connect through testing and review to public evidence.
Engineering evidence circuit

Current public releases

MATLAB Energy Lab
v1.12.0Published 21 Oct 2026
Datacenter Twin Lab
v2.0.1Published 26 Oct 2026
HelioForge
30 Oct 2026 releasePublished 30 Oct 2026

Checked .

Inspectable work

Start with something you can examine.

Models and QA/QC references with their assumptions, limits and sources.

Open models

Run and inspect a model.

Battery thermal and DC-link references in MATLAB and Python, with tests and stated limits.

Open model library

BESS QA/QC

Trace acceptance evidence.

Requirements, FAT/SAT, NCR closure and handover, connected by sanitized QA/QC records.

Open artifact library

Agentic Engineering

Keep the agent accountable.

A draft curriculum for tool use, automated checks, failure handling and engineer approval.

Review the syllabus
Find a tool by engineering question

Engineering artifact finder

Search existing models and QA/QC references by topic. Each result includes its source and limits.

Matching sourcesLOCAL / NO API

Choose a topic to see its sources.

Battery models, converter equations and QA/QC tools, with source records and limits alongside each result.

Ready · Search stays in this browser

Open engineering models

Run the equations. Inspect the assumptions.

Explore a modelling laboratory, thermal sensitivity model and QA/QC toolkit. Each record has a revision and scope; passing software checks does not qualify hardware or a safety-critical design.

26 historical entry points

Battery · converters · BESS control · MATLAB/Simulink

MATLAB Simulink Energy Lab

RC → SOC-EKF → electro-thermal → BESS control
Source
Pinned CI · ebf2a0c; historical tag v0.10.0
Evidence
20 Base MATLAB · 26 total entry points · 31 focused BESS results
Explore the validated lab
Explore six more model references

6 of 6 additional model references · All

84 repository tests

Battery thermal · research translation · Python

Battery Thermal Modeling Notes

source → equation → interval → engineering decision
Source
Commit afef3c2 · historical notes 14e399f
Evidence
84 unit tests in CI · 10 subtests in suite
Trace the thermal evidence
151 repository tests

Grid services · executable playbook · Python

Smart Grid Storage Playbook

P, Q, f, V, SoC → constraint-aware dispatch
Source
Commit 3ce0b4b · pinned playbook
Coverage
P-Q capability · frequency · voltage · energy (151 tests)
Explore grid-service limits

Explore the complete open-engineering library Explore browser laboratories Browse all public repositories

Engineering decisions

What had to be decided, and what evidence made the decision possible.

Employer-and-date context stays visible; confidential project data stays private.

Utility-scale energy storage EPC review workflow

Vestas · 2018–2019

Utility-scale ESS/EPC review

Situation
Bidder assumptions and interfaces needed a common review baseline.
Action
Structured sizing inputs, technical responses, and risk ownership.
Result
A decision-ready review trail before procurement and execution.
Review the EPC case
BESS QA/QC inspection and traceability workflow

TotalEnergies · 2019–2022

BESS QA/QC and acceptance

Situation
Acceptance evidence was distributed across suppliers and milestones.
Action
Linked criteria, FAT/SAT evidence, NCR status, and commissioning records.
Result
A traceable handover path with visible ownership and closure status.
Review the QA/QC case

Human-supervised AI

AI should accelerate engineering work without obscuring responsibility.

The workflow exposes the objective, approved tools, generated artifacts, checks, stop conditions, and accountable reviewer.

Agentic engineering with explicit approval boundaries

Every generated artifact remains connected to its input, tool, test, and accountable reviewer.

  1. RequirementBounded objective
  2. Agent planVisible steps
  3. Tool callMATLAB / Simulink
  4. VerificationTests and limits
  5. EvidenceReviewable package
  6. EngineerReview required
Stop conditions
  • Missing inputs
  • Failed tests
  • Unsupported assumptions
  • Safety-relevant decision
  • Unclear approval authority
Curriculum draft · Labs and public package in development

Bounded input

Define what the agent may and may not decide.

Record the objective, system boundary, available evidence, prohibited actions, stop conditions, and approval authority.

Review the seven-module syllabus Download AI research context

Illustrative workflow scenario

Illustrative scenario: BESS thermal safety review

  1. Proposed — The engine suggested a conservative cooldown profile and a revised current envelope for a candidate pack design.

  2. Illustrative check — In this hypothetical scenario, checks flag two edge cases outside acceptance bounds, including edge-zone hotspot growth in case 4; no test was run and no evidence package is implied.

  3. Engineer review — The engineer withholds acceptance because the illustrative residuals do not meet safety bounds and requests revised boundary conditions and another validation run.

Illustrative outcome: Human approval remains required; this is not an executed pilot, test result, or field outcome.

See the illustrative workflow

Published research

Research earns another life when its assumptions can be inspected in code.

The DOI establishes the scientific record. The implementation exposes selected equations, assumptions, tests, and engineering limits.

  1. DOI
  2. Question
  3. Equation
  4. Implementation
  5. Test
  6. Known limits

BESS QA/QC traceability resources

The one-page checklist, ten-row CSV sample and expanded 18-row CSV are available immediately. They are sanitized examples, not controlled project documents. You can also prepare an email request for the same template.

Technical conversation

Bring one model, requirement, or review bottleneck.

Send the system boundary, available evidence, and decision deadline. I will reply with the most relevant model, case study, or technical next step.