Situation
FAT/SAT evidence, deviations, NCRs, punch items, commissioning records, and warranty feedback could lose context between teams and gates.
Engineering case study
At TotalEnergies from 2019 to 2022, I worked across BESS portfolio intelligence, quality-cost drivers, warranty cases, standards, FAT/SAT evidence, NCR follow-up, and handover discipline.
This professional experience summary covers TotalEnergies, France, from November 2019 to June 2022. Explore the full-size graphic or read its complete text below.
Download the BESS leadership SVG
MOHAMMAD REZWAN KHAN
PhD | R&D ENGINEER
TotalEnergies, France (Nov 2019 – June 2022)
Driving global battery storage strategy and corporate decarbonization initiatives through technical innovation.
Analyzed global BESS standards and competitor trends to build the company's decarbonization roadmap.
Illustration captions: GLOBAL STANDARDS; COMPETITOR ANALYSIS.
Managed technical specifications and business cases to ensure cross-portfolio compatibility for BESS developments.
Illustration captions: TECHNICAL SPECS; COMPATIBILITY.
Optimized battery sizing, siting, and O&M for the interconnection of storage with Oil & Gas generators.
Illustration captions: O&M.
Provided affiliate support and developed training materials for international trade shows and strategic meetings.
Illustration captions: TRAINING; AFFILIATE SUPPORT.
Situation, task, action, result
FAT/SAT evidence, deviations, NCRs, punch items, commissioning records, and warranty feedback could lose context between teams and gates.
Connect inspection discipline with engineering feedback and supplier accountability without reducing quality work to document collection.
Aligned requirements, test procedures, acceptance criteria, owners, evidence references, NCR status, and closure decisions.
Reviewers could follow an item from planned acceptance through test evidence, deviation handling, and handover disposition.
Six-step traceability spine
Identify the approved technical or quality obligation.
State how the obligation will be inspected or tested.
Define the pass condition before execution begins.
Link the controlled record, log, drawing, or inspection result.
Assign failed or incomplete items to a named NCR and owner.
Record due date, objective evidence, decision, and handover status.
Public proof artifact
The sample contains template fields and example acceptance wording only. It includes no client data, test result, or confidential project identifier.
Deeper template
The fuller template extends the sample across design review, supplier review, FAT, SAT, commissioning, NCR closure, punch-list control, and handover.
The expanded CSV adds eight example rows across these review gates. It contains sanitized template wording, not client records or approved acceptance criteria. Your team must assign project requirements, evidence, owners and approval authority before use.
The expanded CSV is available immediately below. If you prefer to request the same template by email, prepare and inspect your message locally; copy or download the message if you do not use an email application.
Download 18-row CSV template Request full template by emailThe contribution described here connects BESS quality requirements, acceptance records, deviation follow-up and handover information. It does not claim sole authorship of supplier tests, team deliverables or project acceptance decisions.
The bounded outcome is the traceability structure described above: a reviewer can follow an acceptance item through its evidence and disposition. No measured defect reduction, time saving or commercial result is asserted.
In the public ten-row CSV, REQ-QA-021 connects the pre-FAT calibration register to REF-003, a QA/QC owner, status Template and closure Pending. These are example identifiers and fields, not a completed inspection.
Illustrative review decision: if the required calibration evidence is missing or unsuitable for the test, retain the pending disposition, identify the responsible owner and obtain the controlled record before acceptance. A populated row alone does not demonstrate readiness.
This example is derived from the sanitized public sample. It does not disclose a TotalEnergies failure, supplier or project record.
Evidence boundary
This case identifies employer, period, scope, and a reusable QA/QC structure. It does not disclose project-specific failures, suppliers, commercial values, or performance improvements that cannot be verified publicly.